Close Menu
Chicago News Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Chicago News JournalChicago News Journal
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Television
    • Film
    • Books
    • Contact
      • About us
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    Chicago News Journal
    Home»Politics

    Federal trade court strikes down Trump’s reciprocal tariffs

    AdminBy AdminMay 29, 2025 Politics
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram
    Federal trade court strikes down Trump’s reciprocal tariffs

    U.S. President Donald Trump holds up a chart while speaking during a “Make America Wealthy Again” trade announcement on April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC.

    Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    A federal court ruled Wednesday that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority with his reciprocal tariffs, dealing a blow to a major tenet of the president’s economic agenda.

    A three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 law that Trump invoked to justify the tariffs, does not actually give the president the power to unilaterally implement the sweeping duties.

    “The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs,” the judges wrote in their ruling.

    “The Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders,” they continued.

    Dow futures jumped 400 points Wednesday on news of the ruling.

    Implementing tariffs typically requires congressional approval, but Trump chose to bypass Congress by declaring a national economic emergency, and using the purported emergency as justification for invoking the tariffs on his own.

    The Trump administration swiftly appealed the ruling Wednesday.

    “Foreign countries’ nonreciprocal treatment of the United States has fueled America’s historic and persistent trade deficits,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement after the order.

    “These deficits have created a national emergency that has decimated American communities, left our workers behind, and weakened our defense industrial base – facts that the court did not dispute.”

    “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,” Desai added.

    The ruling — and subsequent Trump administration appeal — likely sets up a bitter legal battle that could wind up at the Supreme Court.

    The suit was brought on behalf of five U.S. businesses that rely on imports from the U.S. to some extent. The judges said that Trump’s tariff orders were “unlawful as to all,” not just the plaintiffs, so there would be “no question here of narrowly tailored relief.”

    The judges ordered the challenged tariffs to be “vacated and their operation permanently enjoined.”

    Trump, on April 2, announced sweeping reciprocal tariffs on imports from nations around the world. Days later, on April 9, he issued a 90-day pause, but kept in place the 10% baseline tariffs on most products entering the country.

    This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

    Read the original article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram

    You might also be interested in...

    Trump appoints committee to investigate statements by the Fed’s Lisa Cook

    October 9, 2026

    U.S. East Asian envoy says investors are overpricing Taiwan conflict risk

    October 9, 2026

    Trump says U.S. will not attack Iran before midterm election

    October 8, 2026

    Trump downplays Iran deal as U.S. readies renewed strikes

    October 8, 2026

    Rubio says Iran passed up ‘multiple’ chances for nuclear deal

    October 7, 2026

    Singapore’s Temasek warns of the ‘biggest risk’ facing markets

    October 7, 2026
    Popular Posts

    U.S. East Asian envoy says investors are overpricing Taiwan conflict risk

    Interview with LJ Evans, Author of The Moments We Chose Love

    5 Best Beard Dandruff Shampoos: Defeat the Flakes in 2026

    ‘RHOC’ Emily Simpson Comes To Blows With Husband Over Son

    ‘A Prayer for the Dying’ Interview: Johnny Flynn and More

    Britain welcomed Chinese EVs. Now it faces a difficult choice

    Categories
    • Books (2,381)
    • Business (3,362)
    • Events (32)
    • Film (258)
    • LifeStyle (2,848)
    • Music (2,716)
    • Politics (2,281)
    • Science (1,896)
    • Technology (1,788)
    • Television (4,301)
    • Uncategorized (3)
    • US News (3,213)
    Archives
    Useful Links
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Popular Posts
    • Mar-a-Lago shooting: Gunman dead; Trump safeMar-a-Lago shooting: Gunman dead; Trump safe
    • Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 AI PC With Intel Core Ultra 9 Chip, Up to GeForce RTX 5080 GPU Launched in IndiaGigabyte Aorus Master 16 AI PC With Intel Core Ultra 9 Chip, Up to GeForce RTX 5080 GPU Launched in India
    • ‘McBee Dynasty’ Calah Leaves Petty Comment On Steven’s Post‘McBee Dynasty’ Calah Leaves Petty Comment On Steven’s Post
    • Trump to pardon reality TV stars Todd and Julie ChrisleyTrump to pardon reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley
    • Congressional Republicans rally around Trump’s White House ballroom projectCongressional Republicans rally around Trump’s White House ballroom project
    Archives
    Categories
    • Books
    • Business
    • Events
    • Film
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Television
    • Uncategorized
    • US News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    © 2026 Chicago News Journal. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.