Close Menu
Chicago News Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Chicago News JournalChicago News Journal
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Television
    • Film
    • Books
    • Contact
      • About us
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    Chicago News Journal
    Home»Politics

    DOJ dismissal questioned by judge

    AdminBy AdminFebruary 20, 2025 Politics
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram
    DOJ dismissal questioned by judge

    New York City Mayor Eric Adams arrives at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for a hearing in front of Judge Dale Ho regarding the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss federal corruption charges against Mayor Adams, in New York City on Feb. 19, 2025.

    Brendan McDermid | Reuters

    A federal judge on Wednesday questioned a top Department of Justice official about the DOJ’s controversial request that he dismiss a criminal corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams.

    But Judge Dale Ho reserved deciding whether to grant that motion after a hearing in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

    “I am going to take everything you said under careful consideration,” Ho told acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove and Adams’ lawyer Alex Spiro. “It’s not in anyone’s interest here for this to drag on, I understand that.”

    “But to exercise my discretion properly, I am not going to shoot from my hip right here on the bench,” said Ho, as Adams sat in court looking on. “I want to make sure I consider everything appropriate.”

    Earlier Wednesday, another top DOJ official offered a new rationale for tossing out the case.

    DOJ Chief of Staff Chad Mizelle in a series of 20 tweets questioned the legal theories used by prosecutors in the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s Office to obtain an indictment against Adams last year.

    “The case against Mayor Adams was just one in a long history of past DOJ actions that represent grave errors of judgement,” Mizelle wrote in the first tweet.

    Mizelle’s thread was posted less than two hours before Adams, Spiro and Bove appeared before Ho for the hearing.

    It came days after the acting Manhattan U.S. Attorney of Manhattan, Danielle Sassoon, and six other top prosecutors resigned rather than carry out an order by acting Deputy Attorney General Bove to file the dismissal motion.

    That motion, which Bove and other prosecutors filed Friday, says Bove had concluded that continuing the case would interfere with the mayor’s ability to govern, “which poses unacceptable threats to public safety, national security, and related federal immigration initiatives and policies.”

    The court filing also said Bove concluded the dismissal was necessary “because of the appearances of impropriety and risks of interference” with New York’s primary and mayoral elections this year.

    Bove in a Feb. 10 memo to Sassoon directed her to dismiss the charges against Adams without prejudice. That meant the charges could be refiled in the future. Bove’s memo said the new U.S. Attorney would review the case after they are confirmed by the Senate, and after November’s mayoral election.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    Bove said in the memo that the “Justice Department has reached this conclusion without assessing the strength of the evidence or the legal theories on which the case is based, which are issues on which we defer to the U.S. Attorney’s Office at this time.”

    “Moreover, as I said during our recent meetings, this directive in no way calls into question the integrity and efforts of the line prosecutors responsible forthe case, or your efforts in leading those prosecutors in connection with a matter you,” Bove wrote.

    But nine days after Bove’s memo, Mizelle in his tweet thread gave a detailed analysis of the strength of the case.

    Mizelle’s new justification for dropping the case — that the cost of prosecuting the case is not warranted given that it has little chance of being upheld by appeals courts if Adams were to be found guilty — did not mention immigration enforcement or the appearance of political interference.

    “The amount of resources it takes to bring a prosecution like this is incredible — thousands and thousands of man hours. Those resources could better be used arresting violent criminals to keep New York safe or prosecuting gang and cartel members,” wrote Mizelle.

    Sassoon and others have suggested that the DOJ and Adams have engaged in a quid pro quo in which the department agrees to drop the criminal case in exchange for Adams cooperating with the enforcement of President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.

    Last week, after meeting with Trump’s border czar Tom Homan, the mayor agreed to allow federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents into New York City’s massive jail complex on Rikers Island.

    Sassoon and others who oppose dropping the case have noted that the Trump administration will retain leverage over Adams to gain his continued compliance with the administration’s policies by hanging the threat of reviving the criminal charges against him.

    This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

    Read the original article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram

    You might also be interested in...

    Trump downplays Iran deal as U.S. readies renewed strikes

    October 8, 2026

    Rubio says Iran passed up ‘multiple’ chances for nuclear deal

    October 7, 2026

    Singapore’s Temasek warns of the ‘biggest risk’ facing markets

    October 7, 2026

    Trump says MAGA Inc. PAC to pay for TV ads that praised him

    October 6, 2026

    Trump approves firing squad execution of Fort Hood killer Hasan: Pentagon

    October 6, 2026

    Trump reiterates pledge to send $5,000 checks as elections loom

    October 5, 2026
    Popular Posts

    Nuclear clocks finally see the light – Physics World

    Fed officials see another hike coming, but no sign as to when, minutes show

    Microsoft starts taking preorders for $2,599 Surface Laptop Ultra

    Paul McCartney Releases Three New Songs

    Rubio says Iran passed up ‘multiple’ chances for nuclear deal

    New Mystery and Thriller Books to Read | October 6

    Categories
    • Books (2,378)
    • Business (3,359)
    • Events (32)
    • Film (258)
    • LifeStyle (2,845)
    • Music (2,713)
    • Politics (2,278)
    • Science (1,895)
    • Technology (1,788)
    • Television (4,295)
    • Uncategorized (3)
    • US News (3,210)
    Archives
    Useful Links
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Popular Posts
    • Moderna lowers 2025 sales forecast by  billionModerna lowers 2025 sales forecast by $1 billion
    • Poco F7 India Launch Timeline Leaked; Tipped to Feature Snapdragon 8s Elite ChipsetPoco F7 India Launch Timeline Leaked; Tipped to Feature Snapdragon 8s Elite Chipset
    • Queen Latifah and Gabrielle Union Join Janelle Monae at WeHo PrideQueen Latifah and Gabrielle Union Join Janelle Monae at WeHo Pride
    • China’s quickly gaining an edge over the U.S. in biotechChina’s quickly gaining an edge over the U.S. in biotech
    • Gina Rodriguez to Join Cast of Will Trent Season 3Gina Rodriguez to Join Cast of Will Trent Season 3
    Archives
    Categories
    • Books
    • Business
    • Events
    • Film
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Television
    • Uncategorized
    • US News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    © 2026 Chicago News Journal. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.