Close Menu
Chicago News Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Chicago News JournalChicago News Journal
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Television
    • Film
    • Books
    • Contact
      • About us
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    Chicago News Journal
    Home»Music

    Drake’s voice replaces Tupac and Snoop Dogg In viral fan edit of controversial ‘Taylor Made Freestyle’

    By May 30, 2024 Music
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram
    Drake’s voice replaces Tupac and Snoop Dogg In viral fan edit of controversial ‘Taylor Made Freestyle’

    A Drake fan has replaced the AI voices of Tupac and Snoop Dogg with Drizzy’s own voice in a viral fan edit of ‘Taylor Made Freestyle‘.

    • READ MORE: Drake and Kendrick Lamar’s feud: the full timeline

    Released on April 19 as a diss track aimed at Kendrick Lamar, ‘Taylor Made Freestyle’ featured the AI voices of the late West Coast rapper and Snoop. The song was later pulled from all streaming platforms and all of Drake’s social media accounts following a lawsuit threat from Tupac’s estate.

    Following the release of the track, a Drizzy fan took the time to recreate the song with the use of AI to remove Tupac and Snoop and make Drake rap the song fully. “Someone used AI to add Drake’s voice back to Taylor Made Freestyle after Drake used it to change his voice to Pac and Snoop. What a time to be alive,” wrote a user on X/Twitter.

    Someone used AI to add Drake’s voice back to Taylor Made Freestyle after Drake used it to change his voice to Pac and Snoop. What a time to be alive. https://t.co/xqa39gPKMB

    — twitch.tv/BDolanOfficial (@BDolanSFR) May 19, 2024

    The ‘Headlines’ rapper was hit with a cease-and-desist letter by Tupac’s estate (per Billboard) following the release of ‘Taylor Made Freestyle’ and was told by litigator Howard King that his diss track must be taken down in less than 24 hours. If not, Tupac’s estate would go ahead and  “pursue all of its legal remedies” against him.

    The letter – penned by King – read: “The Estate is deeply dismayed and disappointed by your unauthorized use of Tupac’s voice and personality. Not only is the record a flagrant violation of Tupac’s publicity and the estate’s legal rights, it is also a blatant abuse of the legacy of one of the greatest hip-hop artists of all time. The Estate would never have given its approval for this use.”

    It continued, taking issue with the rappers use of Tupac’s vocals to diss Kendrick Lamar: “The unauthorized, equally dismaying use of Tupac’s voice against Kendrick Lamar, a good friend to the Estate who has given nothing but respect to Tupac and his legacy publicly and privately, compounds the insult.”

    Drake went on to release two more diss tracks aimed at the Pulitzer Prize winning rapper, ‘Family Matters‘ and ‘The Heart Part 6‘. Lamar went on to rebuttle with ‘Not Like Us’ and ‘Meet The Grahams’. ‘Not Like Us’ currently has over 232 million streams on Spotify and has sparked a TikTok trend while ‘The Heart Part 6’ has surpassed 1million dislikes on YouTube.

    In other news, 21 Savage recently surprised fans at a recent Toronto concert by bringing out Drake despite the rapper’s feud with his friend, Metro Boomin.

     

    Read the original article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram

    You might also be interested in...

    Live Nation Defends My Chemical Romance’s Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders

    October 31, 2026

    Billie Eilish, Phoebe Bridgers and more star in My Chemical Romance’s short film ‘Prelude To The End’

    October 30, 2026

    Macklemore, Aurora, and More Unite in Paris for Free Palestine Tour

    October 30, 2026

    Family row breaks out over George Michael items up for auction

    October 29, 2026

    Paris Jackson Calls Executor’s $109 Million Fee Request ‘Offensive’

    October 29, 2026

    Bono admits U2’s ‘Songs of Innocence’ iTunes album giveaway “went too far”

    October 28, 2026
    Popular Posts

    ESI supplying solar array components to missile defense programs

    ICE activity is surging ahead of midterms. So is voter turnout. : NPR

    What Does the Weil Gotshal Implosion Mean for the Law-Firm Industry?

    Judge fast tracks bids to dismiss DOJ lawsuit

    Stephen King Leads October’s Thrill List

    10 Best Date Night Colognes For Men In 2026

    Categories
    • Books (2,422)
    • Business (3,414)
    • Events (33)
    • Film (1,024)
    • LifeStyle (2,889)
    • Music (2,758)
    • Politics (2,323)
    • Science (1,917)
    • Technology (1,788)
    • Television (3,591)
    • Uncategorized (3)
    • US News (3,268)
    Archives
    Useful Links
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Popular Posts
    • Stocks making the biggest moves midday: Southwest Airlines, Qualcomm, Roku, Clorox and more
    • Trump refuses to show health records, Harris questions his fitnessTrump refuses to show health records, Harris questions his fitness
    • Barbie’s designer made missiles for Raytheon first as ‘Barbenheimer’ rocks box offices
    • SpaceX needs to achieve 2 of its moonshots to keep valuation: Steve WestlySpaceX needs to achieve 2 of its moonshots to keep valuation: Steve Westly
    • Could we get quantum spookiness even without entanglement?Could we get quantum spookiness even without entanglement?
    Archives
    Categories
    • Books
    • Business
    • Events
    • Film
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Television
    • Uncategorized
    • US News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    © 2026 Chicago News Journal. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.