Close Menu
Chicago News Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Chicago News JournalChicago News Journal
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Television
    • Film
    • Books
    • Contact
      • About us
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    Chicago News Journal
    Home»Business

    Fed officials were divided on whether to cut rates by half a point in September, minutes show

    AdminBy AdminOctober 9, 2024 Business
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram
    Fed officials were divided on whether to cut rates by half a point in September, minutes show

    WASHINGTON – Federal Reserve officials at their September meeting agreed to cut interest rates but were unsure how aggressive to get, ultimately deciding on a half percentage point move in an effort to balance confidence on inflation with worries over the labor market, according to minutes released Wednesday.

    The meeting summary detailed reasons that policymakers decided to approve a jumbo rate cut of 50 basis points for the first time in more than four years, and showed members divided over the economic outlook.

    Some officials hoped for a smaller, quarter percentage point reduction as they sought assurance that inflation was moving sustainably lower and were less worried about the jobs picture.

    Ultimately, only one Federal Open Market Committee member, Governor Michelle Bowman, voted against the half-point cut, saying she would have preferred a quarter point. But the minutes indicated that others also favored a smaller move. It was the first time a governor had dissented on an interest rate vote since 2005 for a Fed known for its unity on monetary policy.

    “Some participants observed that they would have preferred a 25 basis point reduction of the target range at this meeting, and a few others indicated that they could have supported such a decision,” the minutes stated.

    “Several participants noted that a 25 basis point reduction would be in line with a gradual path of policy normalization that would allow policymakers time to assess the degree of policy restrictiveness as the economy evolved,” the document added. “A few participants also added that a 25 basis point move could signal a more predictable path of policy normalization.”

    Markets moved little following the release, with major averages continuing on pace for big gains.

    Since the meeting, economic indicators have showed that the labor market is perhaps stronger than officials favoring the 50 basis point move had expected.

    In September, nonfarm payrolls increased by 254,000, much more than expected, while the unemployment rate dipped to 4.1%.

    The data has helped cement expectations that while the Fed likely is in the early days of an easing cycle, future cuts likely would not be as aggressive as the September move. Chair Jerome Powell and other Fed officials in recent days have backed the expected 50 basis points in reductions by the end of 2024 as indicated by the “dot plot” unofficial forecast released after the September meeting.

    The minutes noted that the vote to approve the 50 basis point cut came “in light of the progress on inflation and the balance of risks” against the labor market. The minutes noted that “a substantial majority of participants” favored the larger move, without specifying how many were opposed. The term “participants” suggests involvement of the full FOMC rather than just the 12 voters.

    The minutes also noted that some members favored a reduction at the July meeting that never materialized.

    Though the document was more detailed about the debate over whether to approve the 25 basis point cut, there was not as much information about why voters supported the larger move.

    At his post-meeting news conference, Powell used the term “recalibration” to sum up the decision to cut, and the term also appears in the minutes.

    “Participants emphasized that it was important to communicate that the recalibration of the stance of policy at this meeting should not be interpreted as evidence of a less favorable economic outlook or as a signal that the pace of policy easing would be more rapid than participants’ assessments of the appropriate path,” the minutes stated.

    Such a recalibration would bring policy “into better alignment with recent indicators of inflation and the labor market.” Supporters of the 50 basis point cut “also emphasized that such a move would help sustain the strength in the economy and the labor market while continuing to promote progress on inflation, and would reflect the balance of risks.”

    Under normal circumstances, the Fed prefers to cut in quarter-point increments. Previously, the central bank moved by half a point only during Covid and, before that, the 2008 financial crisis.

    Market pricing is pointing to the fed funds rate ending 2025 in the 3.25%-3.5% range, about in line with the median projection of a 3.4% rate, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch. Futures markets previously had been indicating a more aggressive path and in fact now are pricing in about a 1-in-5 chance that the Fed does not cut at its Nov. 6-7 meeting.

    The bond market, though, has been acting differently. Since the Fed meeting, both the 10- and 2-year Treasury yields have surged about 40 basis points.

    Read the original article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram

    You might also be interested in...

    New Orleans port seeks tanker seizure after cruise ship crash sparks $1M lawsuit

    November 15, 2026

    Retailers are turning to entertainment to win shoppers attention

    November 14, 2026

    Eric Trump-backed robot soldier startup can't pay staff after founder borrowed $4.6 million from company to buy home

    November 14, 2026

    FAA issues nationwide ground stop due to extraordinary circumstances

    November 14, 2026

    Jensen Huang joins list of high-profile founders ousted from their own companies

    November 13, 2026

    Disney's 'Star Wars' is coming to Cosm domes ahead of 50th anniversary as part of multiyear film deal

    November 12, 2026
    Popular Posts

    Natalia Dyer and Elijah Wood Join the 1408 Sequel

    Retailers are turning to entertainment to win shoppers attention

    Eric Trump-backed robot soldier startup can't pay staff after founder borrowed $4.6 million from company to buy home

    Kate Nash to lose $16,000 from current tour as she keeps afloat with OnlyFans money

    Book Riots Deals of the Day for November 14, 2026

    2 Americans die in suspected drowning incident in the Bahamas

    Categories
    • Books (2,448)
    • Business (3,444)
    • Events (34)
    • Film (1,054)
    • LifeStyle (2,915)
    • Music (2,787)
    • Politics (2,352)
    • Science (1,943)
    • Technology (1,809)
    • Television (3,620)
    • US News (3,286)
    Archives
    Useful Links
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Popular Posts
    • The 15-inch MacBook Air offers superb battery life and portability at an aggressive price
    • Shopping the Madewell Fall 2024 SaleShopping the Madewell Fall 2024 Sale
    • Mortal Kombat 1 Shows Off Kameo Fighters in Bone-Krunching Gameplay Trailer
    • Trump says JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America rejected him as a customerTrump says JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America rejected him as a customer
    • Jack White Adds Winter 2025 European Dates to No Name TourJack White Adds Winter 2025 European Dates to No Name Tour
    Archives
    Categories
    • Books
    • Business
    • Events
    • Film
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Television
    • US News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    © 2026 Chicago News Journal. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.