Close Menu
Chicago News Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Chicago News JournalChicago News Journal
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Television
    • Film
    • Books
    • Contact
      • About us
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    Chicago News Journal
    Home»Politics

    Federal trade court strikes down Trump’s reciprocal tariffs

    AdminBy AdminMay 29, 2025 Politics
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram
    Federal trade court strikes down Trump’s reciprocal tariffs

    U.S. President Donald Trump holds up a chart while speaking during a “Make America Wealthy Again” trade announcement on April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC.

    Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    A federal court ruled Wednesday that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority with his reciprocal tariffs, dealing a blow to a major tenet of the president’s economic agenda.

    A three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 law that Trump invoked to justify the tariffs, does not actually give the president the power to unilaterally implement the sweeping duties.

    “The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs,” the judges wrote in their ruling.

    “The Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders,” they continued.

    Dow futures jumped 400 points Wednesday on news of the ruling.

    Implementing tariffs typically requires congressional approval, but Trump chose to bypass Congress by declaring a national economic emergency, and using the purported emergency as justification for invoking the tariffs on his own.

    The Trump administration swiftly appealed the ruling Wednesday.

    “Foreign countries’ nonreciprocal treatment of the United States has fueled America’s historic and persistent trade deficits,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement after the order.

    “These deficits have created a national emergency that has decimated American communities, left our workers behind, and weakened our defense industrial base – facts that the court did not dispute.”

    “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,” Desai added.

    The ruling — and subsequent Trump administration appeal — likely sets up a bitter legal battle that could wind up at the Supreme Court.

    The suit was brought on behalf of five U.S. businesses that rely on imports from the U.S. to some extent. The judges said that Trump’s tariff orders were “unlawful as to all,” not just the plaintiffs, so there would be “no question here of narrowly tailored relief.”

    The judges ordered the challenged tariffs to be “vacated and their operation permanently enjoined.”

    Trump, on April 2, announced sweeping reciprocal tariffs on imports from nations around the world. Days later, on April 9, he issued a 90-day pause, but kept in place the 10% baseline tariffs on most products entering the country.

    This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

    Read the original article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram

    You might also be interested in...

    Israel faces weeks of coalition haggling as neither bloc wins majority

    October 30, 2026

    Governor orders Dan Sullivan recruitment probe

    October 29, 2026

    U.S. DHS officials’ details apparently exposed in massive data breach

    October 29, 2026

    Trump using tariffs as a ‘tool for grift,’ Raskin says, demands donor records

    October 28, 2026

    Trump jokes $5,000 cash would buy hamburger and dessert at Mar-a-Lago

    October 28, 2026

    Judge blasts prosecutors in case against former FBI officials

    October 27, 2026
    Popular Posts

    exploring the future of platinum group metals – Physics World

    Research shows some birds experience jet lag : NPR

    A $1,000 Device Enables Hands-Free Driving. But Fatal Crashes Have Prompted Scrutiny.

    Governor orders Dan Sullivan recruitment probe

    Book Riot’s Deals of the Day for October 29, 2026

    PoloFest Exceeded Everyone’s Expectations – Valet.

    Categories
    • Books (2,420)
    • Business (3,412)
    • Events (33)
    • Film (1,022)
    • LifeStyle (2,887)
    • Music (2,756)
    • Politics (2,321)
    • Science (1,916)
    • Technology (1,788)
    • Television (3,589)
    • Uncategorized (3)
    • US News (3,266)
    Archives
    Useful Links
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Popular Posts
    • Who is Telegram founder Pavel Durov — and why was he arrested?Who is Telegram founder Pavel Durov — and why was he arrested?
    • White House crafting executive order to thwart state AI lawsWhite House crafting executive order to thwart state AI laws
    • OnePay is rolling out crypto to mobile banking appOnePay is rolling out crypto to mobile banking app
    • Radiohead unveil new merch line ahead of European comeback tour kicking offRadiohead unveil new merch line ahead of European comeback tour kicking off
    • 9 of TV’s Hottest Dance Scenes, Ranked9 of TV’s Hottest Dance Scenes, Ranked
    Archives
    Categories
    • Books
    • Business
    • Events
    • Film
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Television
    • Uncategorized
    • US News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    © 2026 Chicago News Journal. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.