Close Menu
Chicago News Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Chicago News JournalChicago News Journal
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Television
    • Film
    • Books
    • Contact
      • About us
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    Chicago News Journal
    Home»Politics

    Trump asks Supreme Court to delay immunity ruling in election case

    AdminBy AdminFebruary 12, 2024 Politics
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram
    Trump asks Supreme Court to delay immunity ruling in election case

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference held at Mar-a-Lago on February 08, 2024 in Palm Beach, Florida. 

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Lawyers for Donald Trump on Monday asked the Supreme Court to temporarily halt a ruling rejecting his claim that he is immune from being criminally charged with trying to overturn his loss in the 2020 presidential election.

    “Without immunity from criminal prosecution, the Presidency as we know it will cease to exist,” Trump’s attorneys wrote in an application for the Supreme Court to pause the ruling from a lower court.

    A three-judge panel in the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., last Tuesday unanimously denied Trump’s argument that he cannot be prosecuted for any official acts he performed as president.

    That ruling would end Trump’s effort to throw out special counsel Jack Smith’s case and restart proceedings in federal district court in D.C.

    But the panel withheld its 57-page ruling from taking effect until Monday, giving Trump’s lawyers time to ask the Supreme Court to pause the case while they file an appeal to the nation’s highest court.

    In applying for that pause Monday afternoon, the defense lawyers argued that the high court should “forestall, once again, an unprecedented and unacceptable departure from ordinary appellate procedures and allow President Trump’s claim of immunity to be decided in the ordinary course of justice.”

    Trump’s immunity claim “presents a novel, complex, and momentous question that warrants careful consideration on appeal,” his attorneys wrote.

    Allowing a former president to face criminal prosecution for official acts will usher in “destructive cycles of recrimination,” and the threat of future indictment “will hang like a millstone around every future President’s neck,” they argued.

    They also argued that the appeals court’s order will threaten “immediate irreparable injury to the First Amendment interests” of Trump and millions of voters, because it will hasten a trial that will “inevitably disrupt President Trump’s ability to campaign against President [Joe] Biden.”

    Trump has sought to delay his multiple criminal and civil cases as he runs for the Republican presidential nomination. He is currently the GOP’s clear front-runner, setting up a likely rematch with Biden.

    Trump’s application for a stay keeps the case on hold, at least until the Supreme Court issues a decision on whether or not to grant the request. An individual justice can make that decision.

    The nine-member Supreme Court includes three justices who were appointed under Trump, but Chief Justice John Roberts, who was nominated by former President George W. Bush, is assigned to handle matters coming from D.C.

    Last week’s ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan’s prior decision denying Trump’s claim of “absolute” presidential immunity.

    Protesters demonstrate outside of the U.S. Supreme Court on February 8, 2024 in Washington, DC. 

    Julia Nikhinson | Getty Images

    “For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant,” read the ruling from appellate Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Michelle Childs and Florence Pan.

    “But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution,” they ruled.

    Trump’s attorneys have argued that the Constitution’s separation-of-powers doctrine prevents the courts from reviewing a president’s official acts. They also argued that the same doctrine requires immunity to avoid hampering the functions of the Executive Branch.

    The appeals court rejected those arguments.

    “At bottom, former President Trump’s stance would collapse our system of separated powers by placing the President beyond the reach of all three Branches,” the judges ruled.

    They also dismissed as “irrational” Trump’s contention that the Constitution only permits charges against a former president if they are first impeached and convicted by Congress.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    Trump was impeached in the House twice while in office, but the Senate on both occasions voted to acquit him. A majority of senators voted to convict Trump in his second impeachment trial on a charge of inciting the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, but the vote fell short of the two-thirds requirement.

    Smith in the D.C. election case is prosecuting Trump on four criminal counts, including conspiracy to defraud the U.S. by trying to reverse the 2020 results and conspiracy to obstruct Congress from certifying Biden’s victory on Jan. 6, 2021.

    Trump has pleaded not guilty to those charges and dozens more in three other active criminal cases, which he claims are part of a conspiracy by the Biden administration to damage him politically.

    — CNBC’s Dan Mangan contributed to this report.

    Read the original article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram

    You might also be interested in...

    Mike Pence Qatari jet gift ‘a bad idea’ Trump should turn down

    May 19, 2025

    Trump says Comey 8647 post called for assassination

    May 18, 2025

    Trump to call Putin, Zelenskyy, NATO members Monday to talk ceasefire

    May 18, 2025

    Trump slams Supreme Court, Taylor Swift, Bruce Springsteen

    May 17, 2025

    Supreme Court rules against Trump administration in Alien Enemies Act case

    May 16, 2025

    Saudi Arabia, Qatar UAE go all out

    May 16, 2025
    Popular Posts

    Ravens QB Lamar Jackson uses horse racing to build up Baltimore

    TV Review: ‘Poker Face’ Season 2

    The Black Keys Detail New Album No Rain, No Flowers, Share Song: Listen

    Trump says Comey 8647 post called for assassination

    The Biggest Bookish News We Covered This Week

    Grok’s ‘white genocide’ responses show gen AI tampered with ‘at will’

    Categories
    • Books (1,369)
    • Business (1,850)
    • Events (11)
    • Film (254)
    • LifeStyle (1,831)
    • Music (1,672)
    • Politics (1,239)
    • Science (1,381)
    • Technology (1,609)
    • Television (2,286)
    • Uncategorized (1)
    • US News (1,708)
    Archives
    Useful Links
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    © 2025 Chicago News Journal. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.