Close Menu
Chicago News Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Chicago News JournalChicago News Journal
    • Home
    • US News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Science
    • Technology
    • LifeStyle
    • Music
    • Television
    • Film
    • Books
    • Contact
      • About us
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    Chicago News Journal
    Home»Politics

    Trump calls Supreme Court mail ballot ruling ‘big loss for Republicans’

    AdminBy AdminSeptember 15, 2026 Politics
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram
    Trump calls Supreme Court mail ballot ruling ‘big loss for Republicans’

    President Donald Trump on Tuesday blasted the Supreme Court for blocking a new controversial U.S. Postal Service rule on mail-in ballots from being used for the upcoming midterm elections after critics warned it would make voting difficult for many people.

    “Republicans just got another bad decision from the United States Supreme Court, one that the Court System took forever to give, and then blamed it, in part, on no time left to implement a solution to our totally CORRUPT and out of control Mail-In voting ‘disaster,'” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

    “It is a big loss for Republicans, and America itself, and makes cheating by the Radical Left ‘Dumocrats,’ on Mail-In Ballots, a much easier thing to do,” Trump said, a day after the Supreme Court decision.

    Trump’s fellow Republicans are trying to retain their slim majorities in both chambers of Congress in November’s elections.

    Trump also harshly criticized his three Supreme Court appointees for apparently joining with all three liberal justices, plus Chief Justice John Roberts, on Monday in upholding a Boston federal district court judge’s injunction preventing the Postal Service rule from being applied to ballots mailed in for November’s elections.

    “These are not the people I interviewed to serve on the United States Supreme Court, they are merely a shell of their original selves, a Court that is costing the United States Trillions of Dollars with shockingly bad rulings,” Trump wrote in his post.

    One of Trump’s appointees who agreed to block the rule for now, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, had written Monday that there is “a fair prospect” that the Postal Service rule might ultimately be found to be legal.

    But Kavanaugh added that “applying the rule in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act because state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections.”

    Trump’s other two appointees are Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett.

    In February, when Gorsuch and Barrett had joined their fellow conservative Roberts and the three liberal justices in a majority ruling against Trump’s wide-ranging tariffs on imports, the president called their votes “an embarrassment to their families, to one another.”

    In his post Tuesday, Trump noted the tariffs ruling.

    “Certain Justices are petrified of these crazed and depraved Democrats, and are totally unable to show the courage necessary to save our America,” the president wrote. “Their horrible decision on Tariffs will be costing the U.S.A., for many years to come, Trillions and Trillions of Dollars.”

    Monday’s majority decision by the Supreme Court was unsigned, and only Kavanaugh wrote a separate, brief concurrence. The fact that only two conservative justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, publicly noted their dissent to the decision strongly suggests there was a 7-2 decision to block the Postal Service rule.

    Trump praised Alito and Thomas for their dissent, calling them “legends.”

    The Postal Service rule, which was issued in late August, implemented an executive order on mail-in ballots issued by Trump in March.

    The rule set new standards for ballot envelopes and required states to create lists of voters who were eligible to obtain mail ballots.

    Read the original article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit Telegram

    You might also be interested in...

    Warren to rip Clarity Act on Senate floor ahead of key preliminary vote

    September 15, 2026

    Iran says it destroyed U.S. drone over Hormuz as conflict intensifies

    September 14, 2026

    China’s Xi urges BRICS to work towards peace in the Middle East

    September 14, 2026

    Vessel struck in Strait of Hormuz, UKMTO says, as talks appear elusive

    September 13, 2026

    Trump sees Iran war ending ‘very soon’, oil prices then falling

    September 13, 2026

    Xi, Putin and Modi meet at BRICS summit amid Trump pressure

    September 12, 2026
    Popular Posts

    Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to lift block on mail-in ballots rule

    Warren to rip Clarity Act on Senate floor ahead of key preliminary vote

    Book Riot’s Deals of the Day for September 14, 2026

    5 Stylish Items to Buy This Week – 9/14/26

    ‘Big Brother’ Fans Shocked, Spot Ghost On Live Feeds

    78th Primetime Emmy Awards 2026 Winners List

    Categories
    • Books (2,333)
    • Business (3,290)
    • Events (31)
    • Film (258)
    • LifeStyle (2,799)
    • Music (2,665)
    • Politics (2,231)
    • Science (1,870)
    • Technology (1,786)
    • Television (4,205)
    • Uncategorized (3)
    • US News (3,141)
    Archives
    Useful Links
    • Contact us
    • About us
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    © 2026 Chicago News Journal. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.